Gamepad Anbernic RG G01
User rating

Anbernic RG G01

Top contributors
Vk's ChannelJohn PunchKodi davisИван Назаров
Test Status:Not verified yet!
LatScore : Wired B, Wireless F
Compatible: AndroidiOSSwitchWindows
Interfaces: CableDongleBluetooth
Price: $69.99, find on: Amazon, Aliexpress
User experience surveys
To join the survey, !

Anbernic RG G01 Input lag comparison

#ConnectionMode
LatencyAverage (ms)
Polling RateMedian (Hz)
Jitter
OSBuild ver.
FWTester ver.
Latency P82
1
CableXInput
🔘7.68
🕹️18.2
1000
🔘1.33
🕹️3.98
Win 11
10.0.26200
---
5.2.3.6
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
5.07 ms
7.68 ms
10.25 ms
1.33 ms
1000 Hz
#8354 • 2026-03-23
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Cable • XInput
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
13.91 ms
18.21 ms
25.25 ms
3.98 ms
1000 Hz
#8353 • 2026-03-23
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Cable • XInput
2
DongleXInput
🔘19.4
🕹️62.9
1000
🔘6.75
🕹️9.91
Win 11
10.0.26200
---
5.2.3.6
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
9.94 ms
19.4 ms
41.88 ms
6.75 ms
1000 Hz
#8355 • 2026-03-23
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Dongle • XInput
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
35.08 ms
62.91 ms
82.74 ms
9.91 ms
1000 Hz
#8375 • 2026-03-24
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Dongle • XInput
3
BluetoothXInput
🔘20.7
🕹️91.9
100
🔘3.90
🕹️9.53
Win 11
10.0.26200
---
5.2.3.6
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
14.19 ms
20.67 ms
34.5 ms
3.9 ms
100 Hz
#8376 • 2026-03-24
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Bluetooth • XInput
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
80.87 ms
91.87 ms
124.16 ms
9.53 ms
100 Hz
#8373 • 2026-03-24
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Bluetooth • XInput
4
DongleSwitch
🔘30.3
🕹️110
100
🔘7.73
🕹️7.94
Win 11
10.0.26200
---
5.2.3.6
🔘
Button LatencyP82
18.61 ms
30.29 ms
48.5 ms
7.73 ms
100 Hz
#8356 • 2026-03-23
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Dongle • Switch
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
86.52 ms
110.09 ms
130.41 ms
7.94 ms
100 Hz
#8357 • 2026-03-23
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Dongle • Switch
5
BluetoothSwitch
🔘31.2
🕹️102
100
🔘9.96
🕹️10.8
Win 11
10.0.26200
---
5.2.3.6
🔘
Button LatencyP82
19.86 ms
31.2 ms
67.87 ms
9.96 ms
100 Hz
#8377 • 2026-03-25
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Bluetooth • Switch
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
83.17 ms
101.88 ms
132.44 ms
10.83 ms
100 Hz
#8374 • 2026-03-24
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.6
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
Vk's Channel
Bluetooth • Switch
More information

Latency

Our visualization focuses on Average Latency, presented as vertical bars to make comparing performance across different connection modes (Wired, Bluetooth, Dongle) instant and intuitive.

The chart differentiates between:

  • Button Latency: How quickly the game registers a physical button press.
  • Stick Latency: The delay in registering joystick movement (tested at 99% deflection).

Visualizing Stability (Jitter)

You may notice that the top portion of some bars is semi-transparent or "faded". This represents Jitter (instability):

  • Solid Bar: Represents the stable, consistent average latency.
  • Faded Top: Indicates the variance. A larger transparent area means higher jitter, implying the controller's response time fluctuates. A solid bar with little to no fading indicates a highly stable connection.

Deep Dive: Click the arrow to reveal Probability Distribution Charts. These show the exact breakdown of every input tested, displaying Probability (%) on the Y-axis and Latency (ms) on the X-axis.

Polling Rate vs. Latency

It is crucial to understand that Polling Rate and Latency are measured using two entirely different methodologies on our site:

  • Latency (ms) is measured by the Prometheus 82 hardware. It captures the physical movement of the stick or button via hardware interrupts with microsecond precision. This is the "real-world" delay.
  • Polling Rate (Hz) is measured via a Software Tool. It shows how often the OS receives reports from the USB stack.

Common Myth: A higher polling rate (like 8000 Hz) does not automatically guarantee lower latency if the controller's internal processing is slow. Conversely, a high polling rate on a chart might show fluctuations (e.g., 7800Hz instead of 8000Hz) due to OS jitter or CPU scheduling, which does not necessarily impact the hardware latency measured by the P82.

To test your own gamepad's polling rate, you can use our tool: Download Polling Rate Tester.

Testing Methods

Gamepadla ensures data integrity by combining three distinct testing methodologies:

  1. Prometheus 82 (P82): Our gold standard. A custom-built hardware device that physically actuates buttons and sticks. It uses high-speed hardware interrupts to capture events, making it independent of the controller's polling rate. It provides an error margin of only ±1ms for buttons and sticks. View on GitHub.

  2. GPDL Tester: An electrical monitoring tool for highly accurate button latency. While P82 simulates human-like mechanical movement, GPDL focuses on the electrical signal speed. View on GitHub.

  3. Software Polling Test: A pure software diagnostic to check communication frequency. We use this to verify if a controller actually reaches its advertised specs (e.g., 1000Hz or 8000Hz) at the OS level. Download Software.

Note: By comparing hardware-level latency (P82) with software-level reports (Polling Test), we can identify if a controller has "fake" high polling rates or poorly optimized firmware.

Stick test of Anbernic RG G01

Stick Movement Linearity Test

Reviews of Anbernic RG G01

Add your own review

Anbernic RG G01 specifications

Internal

D-pad buttons type
Mechanical
Main buttons type
Mechanical
Sticks type
Capacitive

External

Audio port
No
Button layout
Xbox
Display
Yes
Joystick positioning
Asymmetric
Paddles
4
Soulder buttons
No
Stick tension
No
Trigger lock
Yes

Features

Gyroscope function
Yes
NFC support
No
Triggers pressing
Analog

Connection

Charging dock
No
USB interface
Type-C

Software

PC software
No

Platforms

Android
Yes
iOS
Yes
Nintendo Switch
Yes
Playstation 3
No
Playstation 5
No
Playstaton 4
No
Windows
Yes
Xbox One
No
Xbox Series
No
Results based on answers from 3 users. Specifications are verified by moderators and reflect actual device behavior. Found a mistake? Hover over the specification to report it. Want to contribute? Join our questions survey!
User avatarUser avatarUser avatar

LatScore Comparison of Anbernic RG G01

Users' opinion

Add your opinion
To add an opinion, you need to be !
Perfect for mario speedrunning
1 votes

User comments

You must to submit comment.

22 days ago

The clear plastic shell of the Anbernic RG G01 doesn't work for me. It feels cheap and lacks the durability I expect for a serious gaming controller, which affects my confidence during gameplay.

1
50 days ago

Does the Anbernic RG G01 really justify its price? It seems like just another generic gamepad, and I can't help but wonder if we're paying for a name rather than quality. What’s the real value here?

3
32 days ago

It's shit

1
30 days ago

When will someone actually run Doom on the Anbernic RG G01? That's the real question.

3
26 days ago

I recently tried the Anbernic RG G01, and while it's okay, accessing the Macro Programmable mode is frustrating. The documentation isn't very clear, making it feel more like a chore than a useful feature, which is a bit disappointing given its potential.

1
31 days ago

The Anbernic RG G01 is a solid budget PC controller overall. If you like the design and are okay with the Xbox layout, it's a good choice at $40 or less.

1

Wonder do people even remember badabun speedrun

2
75 days ago

This input latency is a nightmare in reality. Is it really real?

1