Hall effect sticks
Gamepad BattlerGC Pro
User rating

BattlerGC Pro

Top contributors
Game Tech TalkJohn Punch
Test Status:Not verified yet!
LatScore : Wired C, Wireless C
Compatible: AndroidiOSLinuxSwitchWindows
Interfaces: CableDongleBluetooth
Price: $64.95, find on: Amazon

BattlerGC Pro Input lag comparison

#ConnectionMode
LatencyAverage (ms)
Polling RateMedian (Hz)
Jitter
OSBuild ver.
FWTester ver.
Latency P82
1
BluetoothSwitch
🔘17.0
🕹️11.1
144.87
🔘5.81
🕹️3.52
Win 11
10.0.26100
---
5.2.3.1
Game Tech Talk
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
10.1 ms
17.02 ms
37.16 ms
5.81 ms
144.87 Hz
#6472 • 2025-09-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
Game Tech Talk
Bluetooth • Switch
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
6.99 ms
11.07 ms
27.66 ms
3.52 ms
144.87 Hz
#6476 • 2025-09-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
Game Tech Talk
Bluetooth • Switch
2
CableXInput
🔘18.6
🕹️16.0
119.13
🔘2.85
🕹️2.81
Win 11
10.0.26100
---
5.2.3.1
Game Tech Talk
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
13.29 ms
18.62 ms
24.19 ms
2.85 ms
119.13 Hz
#6471 • 2025-09-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
Game Tech Talk
Cable • XInput
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
10.63 ms
15.96 ms
21.85 ms
2.81 ms
119.13 Hz
#6475 • 2025-09-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
Game Tech Talk
Cable • XInput
3
DongleXInput
🔘28.5
🕹️21.9
75.36
🔘7.11
🕹️5.12
Win 11
10.0.26100
---
5.2.3.1
Game Tech Talk
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
17.05 ms
28.54 ms
50.42 ms
7.11 ms
75.36 Hz
#6473 • 2025-09-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
Game Tech Talk
Dongle • XInput
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
13.4 ms
21.92 ms
37.54 ms
5.12 ms
75.36 Hz
#6477 • 2025-09-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
Game Tech Talk
Dongle • XInput
4
DongleSony
🔘27.4
🕹️23.2
74.66
🔘6.42
🕹️5.67
Win 11
10.0.26100
---
5.2.3.1
Game Tech Talk
🔘
Button LatencyP82
16.46 ms
27.43 ms
45.25 ms
6.42 ms
74.66 Hz
#6474 • 2025-09-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
Game Tech Talk
Dongle • Sony
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
14.27 ms
23.18 ms
42.88 ms
5.67 ms
74.66 Hz
#6478 • 2025-09-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
Game Tech Talk
Dongle • Sony
More information

Latency

Our visualization focuses on Average Latency, presented as vertical bars to make comparing performance across different connection modes (Wired, Bluetooth, Dongle) instant and intuitive.

The chart differentiates between:

  • Button Latency: How quickly the game registers a physical button press.
  • Stick Latency: The delay in registering joystick movement (tested at 99% deflection).

Visualizing Stability (Jitter)

You may notice that the top portion of some bars is semi-transparent or "faded". This represents Jitter (instability):

  • Solid Bar: Represents the stable, consistent average latency.
  • Faded Top: Indicates the variance. A larger transparent area means higher jitter, implying the controller's response time fluctuates. A solid bar with little to no fading indicates a highly stable connection.

Deep Dive: Click the arrow to reveal Probability Distribution Charts. These show the exact breakdown of every input tested, displaying Probability (%) on the Y-axis and Latency (ms) on the X-axis.

Polling Rate vs. Latency

It is crucial to understand that Polling Rate and Latency are measured using two entirely different methodologies on our site:

  • Latency (ms) is measured by the Prometheus 82 hardware. It captures the physical movement of the stick or button via hardware interrupts with microsecond precision. This is the "real-world" delay.
  • Polling Rate (Hz) is measured via a Software Tool. It shows how often the OS receives reports from the USB stack.

Common Myth: A higher polling rate (like 8000 Hz) does not automatically guarantee lower latency if the controller's internal processing is slow. Conversely, a high polling rate on a chart might show fluctuations (e.g., 7800Hz instead of 8000Hz) due to OS jitter or CPU scheduling, which does not necessarily impact the hardware latency measured by the P82.

To test your own gamepad's polling rate, you can use our tool: Download Polling Rate Tester.

Testing Methods

Gamepadla ensures data integrity by combining three distinct testing methodologies:

  1. Prometheus 82 (P82): Our gold standard. A custom-built hardware device that physically actuates buttons and sticks. It uses high-speed hardware interrupts to capture events, making it independent of the controller's polling rate. It provides an error margin of only ±1ms for buttons and sticks. View on GitHub.

  2. GPDL Tester: An electrical monitoring tool for highly accurate button latency. While P82 simulates human-like mechanical movement, GPDL focuses on the electrical signal speed. View on GitHub.

  3. Software Polling Test: A pure software diagnostic to check communication frequency. We use this to verify if a controller actually reaches its advertised specs (e.g., 1000Hz or 8000Hz) at the OS level. Download Software.

Note: By comparing hardware-level latency (P82) with software-level reports (Polling Test), we can identify if a controller has "fake" high polling rates or poorly optimized firmware.

Stick test of BattlerGC Pro

Stick Movement Linearity Test

Reviews of BattlerGC Pro

Add your own review
User experience surveys
Can this controller wake up the Nintendo Switch?
Indicates whether pressing a button on the controller can wake up a Nintendo Switch console from sleep mode.
Choose one answer
To join the survey, !

BattlerGC Pro specifications

Internal

Battery life hours
10
D-pad buttons type
Mechanical
Main buttons type
Membrane
Sticks type
Hall

External

Audio port
No
Button layout
Other
Display
No
Joystick positioning
Asymmetric
Paddles
2
Rubber handles
No
Shoulder buttons
No
Stick tension
No
Trigger lock
No

Features

NFC support
No
Trigger vibration
No
Triggers pressing
Analog

Connection

Charging dock
No
USB interface
Type-C

Software

Macros option
No

Platforms

Android
Yes
iOS
Yes
Linux
Yes
macOS
Yes
Nintendo Switch
Yes
Playstation 3
No
Playstation 5
No
Playstaton 4
No
Windows
Yes
Xbox One
No
Xbox Series
No
Results based on answers from 5 users. Specifications are verified by moderators and reflect actual device behavior. Found a mistake? Hover over the specification to report it. Want to contribute? Join our questions survey!
User avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatar

LatScore Comparison of BattlerGC Pro

Users' opinion

Add your opinion
To add an opinion, you need to be !
Rumble does not respond correctly.
1 votes

User comments

You must to submit comment.

112 days ago

It's not a perfect replica of the original Gamecube controller, but I'm still pretty happy with it. It's a reliable third-party option that gets the job done, and I appreciate the solid build quality.

1
112 days ago

solid build quality's nice, but is it worth the cash when there's OG Gamecube controllers still floating around?

1
150 days ago

I was expecting pro-level features from the BattlerGC Pro, but it's missing one key thing: analog triggers. What's the point of being a pro controller if you're not giving us the same feel as the original?

1
30 days ago

Analog triggers are exactly what it has though

1