TMR sticks
Gamepad Fantech EOS Pro II S
User rating

Fantech EOS Pro II S

Top contributors
LJ Leejack1e_hannaJohn PunchFarid HasifJuan Mendez
Test Status:Not verified yet!
LatScore : Wired A, Wireless F
Compatible: AndroidiOSLinuxSwitchWindows
Interfaces: CableDongleBluetooth
Price: $39.99

Fantech EOS Pro II S Input lag comparison

#ConnectionMode
LatencyAverage (ms)
Polling RateMedian (Hz)
Jitter
OSBuild ver.
FWTester ver.
Latency P82
1
CableXInput
🔘3.89
🕹️8.58
919.96
🔘0.41
🕹️0.68
Win 11
10.0.26100
1.0
5.2.3.1
LJ Lee
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
3.03 ms
3.89 ms
4.9 ms
0.41 ms
919.96 Hz
#6905 • 2025-10-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
LJ Lee
Cable • XInput
1.0
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
6.7 ms
8.58 ms
10.13 ms
0.68 ms
919.96 Hz
#6900 • 2025-10-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
LJ Lee
Cable • XInput
1.0
2
DongleXInput
🔘17.5
🕹️47.9
997.01
🔘2.64
🕹️2.43
Win 11
10.0.26100
1.0
5.2.3.1
LJ Lee
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
12.86 ms
17.54 ms
25.2 ms
2.64 ms
997.01 Hz
#6904 • 2025-10-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
LJ Lee
Dongle • XInput
1.0
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
42.92 ms
47.87 ms
53.68 ms
2.43 ms
997.01 Hz
#6901 • 2025-10-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
LJ Lee
Dongle • XInput
1.0
3
BluetoothSwitch
🔘28.4
🕹️52.0
114.63
🔘2.90
🕹️8.48
Win 11
10.0.26100
1.0
5.2.3.1
LJ Lee
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
22.7 ms
28.38 ms
37.26 ms
2.9 ms
114.63 Hz
#6903 • 2025-10-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
LJ Lee
Bluetooth • Switch
1.0
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
41.47 ms
52 ms
78.37 ms
8.48 ms
114.63 Hz
#6902 • 2025-10-11
Prometheus 82 v5.2.3.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.26100
LJ Lee
Bluetooth • Switch
1.0
More information

Latency

Our visualization focuses on Average Latency, presented as vertical bars to make comparing performance across different connection modes (Wired, Bluetooth, Dongle) instant and intuitive.

The chart differentiates between:

  • Button Latency: How quickly the game registers a physical button press.
  • Stick Latency: The delay in registering joystick movement (tested at 99% deflection).

Visualizing Stability (Jitter)

You may notice that the top portion of some bars is semi-transparent or "faded". This represents Jitter (instability):

  • Solid Bar: Represents the stable, consistent average latency.
  • Faded Top: Indicates the variance. A larger transparent area means higher jitter, implying the controller's response time fluctuates. A solid bar with little to no fading indicates a highly stable connection.

Deep Dive: Click the arrow to reveal Probability Distribution Charts. These show the exact breakdown of every input tested, displaying Probability (%) on the Y-axis and Latency (ms) on the X-axis.

Polling Rate vs. Latency

It is crucial to understand that Polling Rate and Latency are measured using two entirely different methodologies on our site:

  • Latency (ms) is measured by the Prometheus 82 hardware. It captures the physical movement of the stick or button via hardware interrupts with microsecond precision. This is the "real-world" delay.
  • Polling Rate (Hz) is measured via a Software Tool. It shows how often the OS receives reports from the USB stack.

Common Myth: A higher polling rate (like 8000 Hz) does not automatically guarantee lower latency if the controller's internal processing is slow. Conversely, a high polling rate on a chart might show fluctuations (e.g., 7800Hz instead of 8000Hz) due to OS jitter or CPU scheduling, which does not necessarily impact the hardware latency measured by the P82.

To test your own gamepad's polling rate, you can use our tool: Download Polling Rate Tester.

Testing Methods

Gamepadla ensures data integrity by combining three distinct testing methodologies:

  1. Prometheus 82 (P82): Our gold standard. A custom-built hardware device that physically actuates buttons and sticks. It uses high-speed hardware interrupts to capture events, making it independent of the controller's polling rate. It provides an error margin of only ±1ms for buttons and sticks. View on GitHub.

  2. GPDL Tester: An electrical monitoring tool for highly accurate button latency. While P82 simulates human-like mechanical movement, GPDL focuses on the electrical signal speed. View on GitHub.

  3. Software Polling Test: A pure software diagnostic to check communication frequency. We use this to verify if a controller actually reaches its advertised specs (e.g., 1000Hz or 8000Hz) at the OS level. Download Software.

Note: By comparing hardware-level latency (P82) with software-level reports (Polling Test), we can identify if a controller has "fake" high polling rates or poorly optimized firmware.

Stick test of Fantech EOS Pro II S

Stick Movement Linearity Test

Reviews of Fantech EOS Pro II S

Add your own review
User experience surveys
Which connection modes work on PS4?
Shows which connection modes are supported on PlayStation 4, including Cable, Receiver, and Bluetooth.
Select all modes that apply
To join the survey, !

Fantech EOS Pro II S specifications

Internal

D-pad buttons type
Mechanical
Main buttons type
Mechanical
Sticks type
TMR

External

Audio port
Yes
Button layout
Xbox
Display
No
Joystick positioning
Asymmetric
Paddles
2
Rubber handles
No
Shoulder buttons
No
Stick tension
No
Trigger lock
Yes

Features

Gyroscope function
Yes
NFC support
No
Trigger vibration
No
Triggers pressing
Analog

Connection

Charging dock
Yes
USB interface
Type-C

Software

Macros option
Yes
PC software
No

Platforms

Android
Yes
iOS
Yes
Linux
Yes
macOS
Yes
Nintendo Switch
Yes
Playstation 5
No
Windows
Yes
Xbox One
No
Xbox Series
No
Results based on answers from 6 users. Specifications are verified by moderators and reflect actual device behavior. Found a mistake? Hover over the specification to report it. Want to contribute? Join our questions survey!
User avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatar

LatScore Comparison of Fantech EOS Pro II S

Users' opinion

Add your opinion
To add an opinion, you need to be !
Controller Might be uncomfortable for small hands
1 votes

User comments

You must to submit comment.

97 days ago

I'd advise against wasting your money on this thing. The Fantech EOS Pro II S has a noticeable lag between controller input and in-game response, even with its touted high polling rate, making it a frustrating experience.

1
67 days ago

This controller is terrible. If there's noticeable lag despite the high polling rate, it’s not worth it. There are better options available at a similar price that won't frustrate you.

1
180 days ago

I've been using Fantech for a while now and I think they've made some solid improvements with the EOS Pro II S, but I'd love to hear your take on it.

4
178 days ago

@SparkPlug 5 i've used their gaming mice rn and they're solid imo, but never actually tried their controllers lol. would love to hear your thoughts on the eos pro ii s, how does it stack up for you?

1