Hall effect sticks
Gamepad Machenike G5 Pro V2
User rating

Machenike G5 Pro V2

Top contributors
John PunchFranek ZiemianViolet PrismriverDum Bmonoru
Test Status:Verified (03 February 2025)
LatScore : Wired A, Wireless D
Compatible: AndroidiOSLinuxSwitchWindows
Interfaces: CableDongleBluetooth
Price range: $43.62$69.99, find on: Amazon, Aliexpress

Machenike G5 Pro V2 Input lag comparison

#ConnectionMode
LatencyAverage (ms)
Polling RateMedian (Hz)
Jitter
OSBuild ver.
FWTester ver.
Latency P82
1
CableXInput
🔘1.41
🕹️9.55
796.62
🔘1.16
🕹️0.37
Win 11
10.0.22631
1.38
5.0.8.1
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
0.28 ms
1.41 ms
4.31 ms
1.16 ms
796.62 Hz
#4222 • 2025-02-04
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Cable • XInput
1.38
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
8.88 ms
9.55 ms
10.46 ms
0.37 ms
796.62 Hz
#4203 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Cable • XInput
1.38
2
CableSwitch
🔘8.34
🕹️17.8
124.88
🔘2.37
🕹️2.29
Win 11
10.0.22631
1.38
5.0.8.1
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
3.7 ms
8.34 ms
12.8 ms
2.37 ms
124.88 Hz
#4212 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Cable • Switch
1.38
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
13.44 ms
17.84 ms
22.32 ms
2.29 ms
124.88 Hz
#4202 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Cable • Switch
1.38
3
DongleXInput
🔘11.1
🕹️31.2
986.21
🔘3.50
🕹️2.94
Win 11
10.0.22631
1.38
5.0.8.1
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
5.52 ms
11.1 ms
20.37 ms
3.5 ms
986.21 Hz
#4210 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Dongle • XInput
1.38
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
25.65 ms
31.24 ms
37.72 ms
2.94 ms
986.21 Hz
#4204 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Dongle • XInput
1.38
4
BluetoothXInput
🔘17.9
🕹️27.4
121.41
🔘6.28
🕹️4.24
Win 11
10.0.22631
1.38
5.0.8.1
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
10.01 ms
17.88 ms
49.63 ms
6.28 ms
121.41 Hz
#4208 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Bluetooth • XInput
1.38
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
21.4 ms
27.42 ms
41.4 ms
4.24 ms
121.41 Hz
#4206 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Bluetooth • XInput
1.38
5
BluetoothSwitch
🔘17.1
🕹️28.5
141.18
🔘2.97
🕹️3.43
Win 11
10.0.22631
1.38
5.0.8.1
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
11.17 ms
17.1 ms
25.2 ms
2.97 ms
141.18 Hz
#4209 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Bluetooth • Switch
1.38
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
22.97 ms
28.53 ms
39.65 ms
3.43 ms
141.18 Hz
#4207 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Bluetooth • Switch
1.38
6
DongleSwitch
🔘21.1
🕹️31.7
102.48
🔘3.79
🕹️4.13
Win 11
10.0.22631
1.38
5.0.8.1
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
14.25 ms
21.11 ms
30.63 ms
3.79 ms
102.48 Hz
#4211 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Dongle • Switch
1.38
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
24.47 ms
31.71 ms
41.11 ms
4.13 ms
102.48 Hz
#4205 • 2025-02-03
Prometheus 82 v5.0.8.1
Win 11 Build 10.0.22631
John Punch
Dongle • Switch
1.38
More information

Latency

Our visualization focuses on Average Latency, presented as vertical bars to make comparing performance across different connection modes (Wired, Bluetooth, Dongle) instant and intuitive.

The chart differentiates between:

  • Button Latency: How quickly the game registers a physical button press.
  • Stick Latency: The delay in registering joystick movement (tested at 99% deflection).

Visualizing Stability (Jitter)

You may notice that the top portion of some bars is semi-transparent or "faded". This represents Jitter (instability):

  • Solid Bar: Represents the stable, consistent average latency.
  • Faded Top: Indicates the variance. A larger transparent area means higher jitter, implying the controller's response time fluctuates. A solid bar with little to no fading indicates a highly stable connection.

Deep Dive: Click the arrow to reveal Probability Distribution Charts. These show the exact breakdown of every input tested, displaying Probability (%) on the Y-axis and Latency (ms) on the X-axis.

Polling Rate vs. Latency

It is crucial to understand that Polling Rate and Latency are measured using two entirely different methodologies on our site:

  • Latency (ms) is measured by the Prometheus 82 hardware. It captures the physical movement of the stick or button via hardware interrupts with microsecond precision. This is the "real-world" delay.
  • Polling Rate (Hz) is measured via a Software Tool. It shows how often the OS receives reports from the USB stack.

Common Myth: A higher polling rate (like 8000 Hz) does not automatically guarantee lower latency if the controller's internal processing is slow. Conversely, a high polling rate on a chart might show fluctuations (e.g., 7800Hz instead of 8000Hz) due to OS jitter or CPU scheduling, which does not necessarily impact the hardware latency measured by the P82.

To test your own gamepad's polling rate, you can use our tool: Download Polling Rate Tester.

Testing Methods

Gamepadla ensures data integrity by combining three distinct testing methodologies:

  1. Prometheus 82 (P82): Our gold standard. A custom-built hardware device that physically actuates buttons and sticks. It uses high-speed hardware interrupts to capture events, making it independent of the controller's polling rate. It provides an error margin of only ±1ms for buttons and sticks. View on GitHub.

  2. GPDL Tester: An electrical monitoring tool for highly accurate button latency. While P82 simulates human-like mechanical movement, GPDL focuses on the electrical signal speed. View on GitHub.

  3. Software Polling Test: A pure software diagnostic to check communication frequency. We use this to verify if a controller actually reaches its advertised specs (e.g., 1000Hz or 8000Hz) at the OS level. Download Software.

Note: By comparing hardware-level latency (P82) with software-level reports (Polling Test), we can identify if a controller has "fake" high polling rates or poorly optimized firmware.

Stick test of Machenike G5 Pro V2

Stick Movement Linearity Test

Linearity test for Machenike G5 Pro V2 • Firmware 1.38 • Stick Analyzer 2.0.3.0Dongle connection • Xinput mode • Manual Input. Uploaded, by Dum B

Comment: 1000

Input Type: Manual Input. The stick was moved by hand during the test, so the measurements may include minor variations caused by natural hand tremor.

Stick Motion Resolution Analysis

This test evaluates the analog stick's ability to register unique positions during a controlled, linear motion from the center to the edge of its range. The analysis was conducted using the Line program, ensuring precise measurement of the stick's resolution, linearity, and response characteristics.

Data Points

Data Points represents the total number of unique positions registered during the smooth movement of the stick from center to edge. This includes both the stable analog values and positions affected by signal processing or jitter. In this test, we recorded 401 data points, which is an excellent result that indicates very precise stick movement registration. For a more accurate assessment of stick precision, it's important to also consider the Straight Points metric, which filters out noise and signal processing artifacts.

Straight Points

Straight Points represent the number of unique positions detected after filtering out tremor and signal processing artifacts during stick movement. This filtering process identifies points that follow a consistently increasing trajectory, showing the true analog values without noise. The test registered 395 straight points. This is an excellent result, indicating very smooth and precise stick movement. This value highlights the stick's ability to provide stable and reliable position data during smooth motion.

Resolution

Resolution in this test refers to two complementary measurements:

Total Resolution: 419 positions across the entire stick range. This number represents how many distinct positions the analog stick can detect from center to edge. This might result in somewhat stepped or less smooth movement

Step Resolution: 0.00238 per increment. This value represents the average size of each step between detected positions (smaller values indicate higher precision). It determines how smoothly the stick can transition between positions, which directly impacts precise aiming and subtle movements in games.

A high total resolution combined with a low step resolution provides the optimal experience for precise control in games requiring fine adjustments.

Tremor

Tremor percentage represents the amount of signal processing that occurs between raw stick movement and the final output. It is calculated as the percentage of data points that don't follow a consistently increasing trajectory. The test measured 1.5% tremor. This indicates very stable stick movement with minimal noise in signal processing. Different controllers have different signal processing characteristics, and lower tremor values typically indicate more direct translation of physical movement.

Linearity

Linearity represents how closely the stick movement follows an ideal linear path. It's calculated as 100% minus the nonlinearity percentage, where nonlinearity measures deviations from a perfectly straight line. The test measured 83.6% linearity. This indicates excellent stick linearity, providing consistent and predictable movement.

At the same time, a gamepad stick is not a perfectly linear mechanical system. The stick rotates around a pivot, the cap travels along an arc, and the sensor reads that rotational movement rather than a truly straight physical path. Because of this, a graph that bends slightly below the ideal straight line is often normal. In many cases, that lower arc-like bow reflects the real mechanics of the stick more faithfully than a response that was tuned mainly to look perfectly straight in this specific test.

What matters most is that the movement remains smooth, progressive, and predictable. A mild, even downward curve can be acceptable or even technically more natural, while sharp dips, waviness, uneven acceleration, or asymmetry still indicate worse response quality.

Test Duration

The time taken to complete the test was 6.40 seconds. This is an optimal test duration, providing reliable results. For the most accurate results, the stick movement should be smooth and controlled, typically taking between 5 and 8 seconds.

Linearity test for Machenike G5 Pro V2 • Firmware 1.38 • Stick Analyzer 2.0.3.0Dongle connection • Xinput mode • Manual Input. Uploaded, by Dum B

Comment: 1000

Input Type: Manual Input. The stick was moved by hand during the test, so the measurements may include minor variations caused by natural hand tremor.

Stick Motion Resolution Analysis

This test evaluates the analog stick's ability to register unique positions during a controlled, linear motion from the center to the edge of its range. The analysis was conducted using the Line program, ensuring precise measurement of the stick's resolution, linearity, and response characteristics.

Data Points

Data Points represents the total number of unique positions registered during the smooth movement of the stick from center to edge. This includes both the stable analog values and positions affected by signal processing or jitter. In this test, we recorded 411 data points, which is an excellent result that indicates very precise stick movement registration. For a more accurate assessment of stick precision, it's important to also consider the Straight Points metric, which filters out noise and signal processing artifacts.

Straight Points

Straight Points represent the number of unique positions detected after filtering out tremor and signal processing artifacts during stick movement. This filtering process identifies points that follow a consistently increasing trajectory, showing the true analog values without noise. The test registered 408 straight points. This is an excellent result, indicating very smooth and precise stick movement. This value highlights the stick's ability to provide stable and reliable position data during smooth motion.

Resolution

Resolution in this test refers to two complementary measurements:

Total Resolution: 432 positions across the entire stick range. This number represents how many distinct positions the analog stick can detect from center to edge. This might result in somewhat stepped or less smooth movement

Step Resolution: 0.00231 per increment. This value represents the average size of each step between detected positions (smaller values indicate higher precision). It determines how smoothly the stick can transition between positions, which directly impacts precise aiming and subtle movements in games.

A high total resolution combined with a low step resolution provides the optimal experience for precise control in games requiring fine adjustments.

Tremor

Tremor percentage represents the amount of signal processing that occurs between raw stick movement and the final output. It is calculated as the percentage of data points that don't follow a consistently increasing trajectory. The test measured 0.7% tremor. This indicates very stable stick movement with minimal noise in signal processing. Different controllers have different signal processing characteristics, and lower tremor values typically indicate more direct translation of physical movement.

Linearity

Linearity represents how closely the stick movement follows an ideal linear path. It's calculated as 100% minus the nonlinearity percentage, where nonlinearity measures deviations from a perfectly straight line. The test measured 85.6% linearity. This indicates excellent stick linearity, providing consistent and predictable movement.

At the same time, a gamepad stick is not a perfectly linear mechanical system. The stick rotates around a pivot, the cap travels along an arc, and the sensor reads that rotational movement rather than a truly straight physical path. Because of this, a graph that bends slightly below the ideal straight line is often normal. In many cases, that lower arc-like bow reflects the real mechanics of the stick more faithfully than a response that was tuned mainly to look perfectly straight in this specific test.

What matters most is that the movement remains smooth, progressive, and predictable. A mild, even downward curve can be acceptable or even technically more natural, while sharp dips, waviness, uneven acceleration, or asymmetry still indicate worse response quality.

Test Duration

The time taken to complete the test was 6.32 seconds. This is an optimal test duration, providing reliable results. For the most accurate results, the stick movement should be smooth and controlled, typically taking between 5 and 8 seconds.

Reviews of Machenike G5 Pro V2

Add your own review
User experience surveys
To join the survey, !

Machenike G5 Pro V2 specifications

Internal

Battery life hours
8
D-pad buttons type
Mechanical
Main buttons type
Mechanical
Sticks type
Hall

External

Audio port
No
Button layout
Xbox
Display
No
Joystick positioning
Asymmetric
Paddles
4
Rubber handles
No
Soulder buttons
Yes
Stick tension
No
Trigger lock
Yes

Features

Gyroscope function
Yes
NFC support
No
Switch Wake Up
Yes
Trigger vibration
Yes
Triggers pressing
Analog

Connection

Charging dock
Yes
USB interface
Type-C

Software

Firmware support
Yes
Macros option
Yes
Mobile software
Yes
No Dead Zone
Yes
PC software
No

Platforms

Android
Yes
iOS
Yes
Linux
Yes
macOS
Yes
Nintendo Switch
Yes
Playstation 3
No
Playstation 5
No
Playstaton 4
No
Windows
Yes
Xbox One
No
Xbox Series
No
Results based on answers from 7 users. Specifications are verified by moderators and reflect actual device behavior. Found a mistake? Hover over the specification to report it.
User avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatar

LatScore Comparison of Machenike G5 Pro V2

Users' opinion

Add your opinion
To add an opinion, you need to be !
Better than the BigBig Won Blitz 2?
8 votes

User comments

You must to submit comment.

15 days ago

I've got the Machenike G5 Pro V2 too, and I've been experiencing an issue. When I move the sticks quickly in action games, they tend to pop off the switches slightly. It feels like there's not enough friction, and I'm thinking about gluing them down permanently.

1
175 days ago

Still trying to decide between the Vader 4 pro, Easysmx x20, and G5 pro v2, any thoughts on which one suits my gaming needs better?

5
172 days ago

G5 Pro V2 is a solid choice, but it's hard to beat X20's performance. Vader 4 pro is a close second, but X20's stick quality might not be for everyone, lol.

2
112 days ago

I’m very satisfied with the Machenike G5 Pro overall. However, on Linux it does not work properly out of the box and requires manual configuration for full functionality. To achieve correct mode handling and compatibility, I had to create custom udev rules and adjust driver behavior (hid/xpad) as a temporary workaround. I documented this here to help other Linux users: https://github.com/SwarupGolui/Machenike-G5-Pro There are also minor glitches, and the gyro currently works reliably only in Bluetooth mode on Linux. I strongly recommend developing official Linux software and proper driver integration. Native Linux support would significantly improve stability and expand adoption within the Linux gaming community.

1
173 days ago

i'm planning to upgrade from the g5 pro v1 to the v2 and i'm wondering if the gyro config is still as flexible - can it still be mapped to the sticks, mouse, and dpad, or are those options only available in the v1?

2
173 days ago

yeah the v1 still had some sweet gyro config options, so fingers crossed they didn't remove those in the v2, lol, but tbh, if it's not as flexible, it might be a harder sell for me.

1
edited 166 days ago

@dontMapThat V1 was solid, still a big fan. Mechanical switch took some getting used to, but it's worth it. No major latency or battery issues for me, fingers crossed it stays that way with the V2

1