Input Lag and Specs comparison: Thunderobot G50S vs GameSir Cyclone 2

Gamepad Thunderobot G50S
Gamepad GameSir Cyclone 2
Warning: The comparison module is currently in testing. Data and conclusions may contain errors.

Advantages Comparison

Thunderobot G50S

Advantages

  • Dongle Latency: 11.91 ms (vs 16.97 ms)

GameSir Cyclone 2

Advantages

  • Cable Latency: 6.51 ms (vs 6.83 ms)
  • BT Latency: 6.01 ms (vs 14.28 ms)
  • 🔙 Paddles (2)
  • Sticks: TMR
  • 🔒 Trigger lock
  • 🧱 Audio port
  • Charging dock
  • 📱 Mobile software

Latency Comparison Chart

Detailed Latency Analysis

⚡ LatScore Ratings

LatScore combines button and stick latency and adds a jitter penalty, so stable timing scores better than spiky latency. Lower effective ms = better grade.

LatScore (Cable)
Weighted latency rating for cable connection with a jitter penalty for unstable response.
Thunderobot G50S No data
GameSir Cyclone 2 A (5.2ms)
GameSir Cyclone 2 — 5.2 ms (Thunderobot G50S: no data)
LatScore (Dongle)
Weighted wireless dongle latency rating with jitter-aware stability penalty.
Thunderobot G50S No data
GameSir Cyclone 2 B (14.7ms)
GameSir Cyclone 2 — 14.7 ms (Thunderobot G50S: no data)
LatScore (Bluetooth)
Weighted Bluetooth latency rating with jitter-aware stability penalty.
Thunderobot G50S No data
GameSir Cyclone 2 B (14.1ms)
GameSir Cyclone 2 — 14.1 ms (Thunderobot G50S: no data)

📊 Individual Metrics

🔘 Button Latency (Cable)
Measures how quickly the gamepad responds to button presses when connected via USB cable. Lower values mean faster response.
Thunderobot G50S 6.8 ms
GameSir Cyclone 2 2.4 ms
GameSir Cyclone 2 wins2.4 ms vs 6.8 ms (65% faster)
🕹️ Stick Latency (Cable)
Measures analog stick input delay over USB cable. Important for aiming and precise movements in games.
Thunderobot G50S
GameSir Cyclone 2 6.5 ms
GameSir Cyclone 2 — 6.5 ms (Thunderobot G50S: no data)
🔘 Button Latency (Dongle)
Button response time when using a proprietary 2.4GHz wireless dongle. Usually faster than Bluetooth.
Thunderobot G50S 11.9 ms
GameSir Cyclone 2 7.4 ms
GameSir Cyclone 2 wins7.4 ms vs 11.9 ms (38% faster)
🕹️ Stick Latency (Dongle)
Stick input delay when using the wireless dongle receiver.
Thunderobot G50S
GameSir Cyclone 2 17 ms
GameSir Cyclone 2 — 17 ms (Thunderobot G50S: no data)
🔘 Button Latency (Bluetooth)
Button latency when connected via Bluetooth. Typically higher than cable or dongle connections.
Thunderobot G50S 14.3 ms
GameSir Cyclone 2 6 ms
GameSir Cyclone 2 wins6 ms vs 14.3 ms (58% faster)
🕹️ Stick Latency (Bluetooth)
Stick input delay over Bluetooth connection.
Thunderobot G50S
GameSir Cyclone 2 10.3 ms
GameSir Cyclone 2 — 10.3 ms (Thunderobot G50S: no data)

Spec Comparison

Basic
$45.99
Regular price
$44.5
Internal
Battery life hours
8
Mechanical
D-pad buttons type
Mechanical
Membrane
Main buttons type
Mechanical
Hall
Sticks type
TMR
External
No
Audio port
Yes
Button layout
Xbox
Display
No
Asymmetric
Joystick positioning
Asymmetric
-
Paddles
2
Rubber handles
No
Soulder buttons
No
Stick tension
No
No
Trigger lock
Yes
Features
Yes
Gyroscope function
Yes
No
NFC support
No
Yes
Switch Wake Up
Yes
Trigger vibration
No
Analog
Triggers pressing
Analog
Connection
No
Charging dock
Yes
Type-C
USB interface
Type-C
Software
Firmware support
Yes
Yes
Macros option
Yes
No
Mobile software
Yes
Yes
No Dead Zone
Yes
PC software
Yes
Platforms
Yes
Android
Yes
Yes
iOS
Yes
Yes
Linux
Yes
macOS
No
Yes
Nintendo Switch
Yes
Playstation 3
No
No
Playstation 5
No
No
Playstaton 4
No
Yes
Windows
Yes
No
Xbox One
No
No
Xbox Series
No

Summary & Verdict

🏆
Overall Winner:
GameSir Cyclone 2
Confidence: High (5/6)
Thunderobot G50S
Thunderobot G50S
$45.99
VS
GameSir Cyclone 2
GameSir Cyclone 2
$44.5
Scorecard
Thunderobot G50SGameSir Cyclone 2
5050
TIE6.8 ms vs 6.5 ms
6535
WIN11.9 ms vs 17 ms
0100
WIN0 vs 100 score
5050
TIESame platforms
0100
WIN0 vs 3 features
4852
WIN$45.99 vs $44.5
Key takeaways
  • Worst Wired latency: Tie6.8 ms vs 6.5 ms
  • 📡Worst Dongle latency: Thunderobot G50S11.9 ms vs 17 ms
  • 🧩Features & controls: GameSir Cyclone 2details
  • 🌐Compatibility: same platformsplatforms