TMR sticks
Gamepad ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K
User rating

ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K

Top contributors
John PunchvCudayukaMAGICГеймпад Бар
Test Status:Verified (25 May 2026)
LatScore : Wired A+, Wireless B
Compatible: iOSLinuxSwitchWindows
Interfaces: CableDongleBluetooth
Price: $69.99

ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K Input lag comparison

#ConnectionMode
LatencyAverage (ms)
Polling RateMedian (Hz)
Jitter
OSBuild ver.
FWTester ver.
Latency P82
1
CableXInput
🔘2.53
🕹️0.57
8000
🔘0.81
🕹️0.08
Win 11
10.0.26200
1.12
5.3.0.0
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
1.25 ms
2.53 ms
4.47 ms
0.81 ms
8000 Hz (see 📊)
#9070 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Cable • XInput
1.12
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
0.44 ms
0.57 ms
0.82 ms
0.08 ms
8000 Hz (see 📊)
#9071 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Cable • XInput
1.12
📊
Polling Rate
0.06 ms
0.12 ms
0.54 ms
0.04 ms
8000 Hz
7907.46 Hz
#9069 • 2026-05-25
Polling v2.0.2.5
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Cable • XInput
1.12
Note: This test are based on polling rate and do not represent actual input-lag.
2
CableXInput
🔘2.54
🕹️0.75
8000
🔘0.72
🕹️0.11
Win 10
10.0.19045
1.12
5.3.0.2
vCuda
🔘
Button LatencyP82
1.48 ms
2.54 ms
4.46 ms
0.72 ms
8000 Hz
#9377 • 2026-06-20
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.2
Win 10 Build 10.0.19045
vCuda
Cable • XInput
1.12
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
0.49 ms
0.75 ms
0.98 ms
0.11 ms
8000 Hz
#9374 • 2026-06-20
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.2
Win 10 Build 10.0.19045
vCuda
Cable • XInput
1.12
3
DongleXInput
🔘8.07
🕹️9.19
305
🔘2.13
🕹️2.20
Win 10
10.0.19045
1.12
5.3.0.2
vCuda
🔘
Button LatencyP82
4.32 ms
8.07 ms
14.2 ms
2.13 ms
305 Hz
#9376 • 2026-06-20
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.2
Win 10 Build 10.0.19045
vCuda
Dongle • XInput
1.12
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
5.57 ms
9.19 ms
15.57 ms
2.2 ms
311 Hz
#9375 • 2026-06-20
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.2
Win 10 Build 10.0.19045
vCuda
Dongle • XInput
1.12
4
DongleXInput
🔘8.04
🕹️9.97
982.32
🔘1.91
🕹️3.43
Win 11
10.0.26200
1.12
5.3.0.0
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
4.74 ms
8.04 ms
13.83 ms
1.91 ms
982.32 Hz (see 📊)
#9081 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Dongle • XInput
1.12
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
6.1 ms
9.97 ms
36.03 ms
3.43 ms
982.32 Hz (see 📊)
#9082 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Dongle • XInput
1.12
📊
Polling Rate
0.76 ms
1.02 ms
7.97 ms
0.91 ms
982.32 Hz
731.75 Hz
#9087 • 2026-05-25
Polling v2.0.2.5
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Dongle • XInput
1.12
Note: This test are based on polling rate and do not represent actual input-lag.
5
BluetoothXInput
🔘7.29
🕹️12.6
268.31
🔘4.40
🕹️3.02
Win 11
10.0.26200
1.12
5.3.0.0
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
✓ Selected
3.24 ms
7.29 ms
28.17 ms
4.4 ms
268.31 Hz (see 📊)
#9075 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Bluetooth • XInput
1.12
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
✓ Selected
7.62 ms
12.62 ms
20.96 ms
3.02 ms
268.31 Hz (see 📊)
#9077 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Bluetooth • XInput
1.12
📊
Polling Rate
1.22 ms
3.73 ms
25.09 ms
2.54 ms
268.31 Hz
220.62 Hz
#9076 • 2026-05-25
Polling v2.0.2.5
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Bluetooth • XInput
1.12
Note: This test are based on polling rate and do not represent actual input-lag.
6
CableSwitch
🔘10.7
🕹️11.0
124.92
🔘3.32
🕹️3.44
Win 11
10.0.26200
1.12
5.3.0.0
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
3.65 ms
10.67 ms
17.56 ms
3.32 ms
124.92 Hz (see 📊)
#9084 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Cable • Switch
1.12
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
3.06 ms
11 ms
18.61 ms
3.44 ms
124.92 Hz (see 📊)
#9085 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Cable • Switch
1.12
📊
Polling Rate
7.92 ms
8.01 ms
16.09 ms
3.55 ms
124.92 Hz
96.08 Hz
#9086 • 2026-05-25
Polling v2.0.2.5
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Cable • Switch
1.12
Note: This test are based on polling rate and do not represent actual input-lag.
7
BluetoothSwitch
🔘12.1
🕹️12.7
66.75
🔘4.36
🕹️4.50
Win 11
10.0.26200
1.12
5.3.0.0
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
4.28 ms
12.05 ms
22.14 ms
4.36 ms
66.75 Hz (see 📊)
#9074 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Bluetooth • Switch
1.12
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
4.84 ms
12.68 ms
22.66 ms
4.5 ms
66.75 Hz (see 📊)
#9073 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Bluetooth • Switch
1.12
📊
Polling Rate
7.3 ms
14.98 ms
28.55 ms
3.5 ms
66.75 Hz
70.81 Hz
#9072 • 2026-05-25
Polling v2.0.2.5
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Bluetooth • Switch
1.12
Note: This test are based on polling rate and do not represent actual input-lag.
8
DongleSwitch
🔘15.9
🕹️18.6
100
🔘4.19
🕹️2.81
Win 11
10.0.26200
1.12
5.3.0.0
John Punch
🔘
Button LatencyP82
5.24 ms
15.93 ms
23.33 ms
4.19 ms
100 Hz (see 📊)
#9080 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Dongle • Switch
1.12
🕹️
Stick LatencyP82
13.67 ms
18.61 ms
24.26 ms
2.81 ms
100 Hz (see 📊)
#9079 • 2026-05-25
Prometheus 82 v5.3.0.0
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Dongle • Switch
1.12
📊
Polling Rate
9.91 ms
10 ms
20.02 ms
1.67 ms
100 Hz
100.02 Hz
#9078 • 2026-05-25
Polling v2.0.2.5
Win 11 Build 10.0.26200
John Punch
Dongle • Switch
1.12
Note: This test are based on polling rate and do not represent actual input-lag.
More information

Latency

Our visualization focuses on Average Latency, presented as vertical bars to make comparing performance across different connection modes (Wired, Bluetooth, Dongle) instant and intuitive.

The chart differentiates between:

  • Button Latency: How quickly the game registers a physical button press.
  • Stick Latency: The delay in registering joystick movement (tested at 99% deflection).

Visualizing Stability (Jitter)

You may notice that the top portion of some bars is semi-transparent or "faded". This represents Jitter (instability):

  • Solid Bar: Represents the stable, consistent average latency.
  • Faded Top: Indicates the variance. A larger transparent area means higher jitter, implying the controller's response time fluctuates. A solid bar with little to no fading indicates a highly stable connection.

Deep Dive: Click the arrow to reveal Probability Distribution Charts. These show the exact breakdown of every input tested, displaying Probability (%) on the Y-axis and Latency (ms) on the X-axis.

Polling Rate vs. Latency

It is crucial to understand that Polling Rate and Latency are measured using two entirely different methodologies on our site:

  • Latency (ms) is measured by the Prometheus 82 hardware. It captures the physical movement of the stick or button via hardware interrupts with microsecond precision. This is the "real-world" delay.
  • Polling Rate (Hz) is measured via a Software Tool. It shows how often the OS receives reports from the USB stack.

Common Myth: A higher polling rate (like 8000 Hz) does not automatically guarantee lower latency if the controller's internal processing is slow. Conversely, a high polling rate on a chart might show fluctuations (e.g., 7800Hz instead of 8000Hz) due to OS jitter or CPU scheduling, which does not necessarily impact the hardware latency measured by the P82.

To test your own gamepad's polling rate, you can use our tool: Download Polling Rate Tester.

Testing Methods

Gamepadla ensures data integrity by combining three distinct testing methodologies:

  1. Prometheus 82 (P82): Our gold standard. A custom-built hardware device that physically actuates buttons and sticks. It uses high-speed hardware interrupts to capture events, making it independent of the controller's polling rate. It provides an error margin of only ±1ms for buttons and sticks. View on GitHub.

  2. GPDL Tester: An electrical monitoring tool for highly accurate button latency. While P82 simulates human-like mechanical movement, GPDL focuses on the electrical signal speed. View on GitHub.

  3. Software Polling Test: A pure software diagnostic to check communication frequency. We use this to verify if a controller actually reaches its advertised specs (e.g., 1000Hz or 8000Hz) at the OS level. Download Software.

Note: By comparing hardware-level latency (P82) with software-level reports (Polling Test), we can identify if a controller has "fake" high polling rates or poorly optimized firmware.

Stick test of ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K

Stick test results for ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K gamepad, by John Punch

Left Stick
Circle Error:2.5%
Asymmetry:11.4%
Center Error:3.1%
Resolution:9.8 bit910 steps
Right Stick
Circle Error:2.2%
Asymmetry:6.5%
Center Error:3.9%
Resolution:9.7 bit830 steps
OSWindows 10.0.26200
Sys. nameController (XBOX 360 For Windows)
ModeXInput
ConnectionCable
Firmware1.12
Polling rate7997.32 Hz
Tested onMay 25, 2026, 10:57

Errors Panel

Cardinal Snappingnone
Inner Deadzonenone
Center Skipnone
Low Resolutionnone
Incomplete Rangenone

Inner Deadzone

The Inner Deadzone is the area around the center of the stick where small movements are not registered. This helps prevent stick drift or accidental inputs, but if the deadzone is too large, it can make aiming less precise, especially in games requiring fine control. We evaluate the Inner Deadzone based on how much you need to move the stick before it responds—the less movement required, the better.

The ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K has no Inner Deadzone. The stick responds immediately to even the slightest movement, which is excellent for aiming accuracy and micro-control. This makes it a great choice for precision-heavy games like first-person shooters (e.g., Valorant or Apex Legends).

For comparison, many budget gamepads often have a moderate to large Inner Deadzone, while premium controllers typically aim for a slight or no deadzone for better precision.

Want to learn more? Check out our video explanation of how the Inner Deadzone works.

Outer Deadzone

The Outer Deadzone is the area near the edge of the stick’s range where further movement isn’t registered. This can make the stick feel less responsive at full tilt, affecting actions like quick turns or maximum speed in games. We evaluate the Outer Deadzone based on how much 'lost' range there is—the smaller the deadzone, the better, as it allows full use of the stick’s range for more precise control.

The ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K has a slight Outer Deadzone (0.5 mm). There’s a portion of the stick’s range that isn’t registered, but it’s minimal and unlikely to affect gameplay noticeably.

Per-stick breakdown for the ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K: the left stick measures 0.5 mm, which corresponds to a slight Outer Deadzone, while the right stick measures 0.5 mm, which corresponds to a slight Outer Deadzone. This helps show whether the controller loses range evenly on both sticks or if one stick is noticeably weaker near full tilt.

Both sticks show the same measured Outer Deadzone, which suggests consistent edge behavior between movement and camera inputs.

For comparison, budget gamepads often have moderate to large Outer Deadzones, while premium controllers strive for minimal or no deadzone to maximize control.

Want to learn more? Check out our video explanation of how the Outer Deadzone works.

Stick Asymmetry

Stick Asymmetry measures the consistency of the joystick's response across different directions. Ideally, if you physically deflect the stick by 80% from the center, the software should report an 80% deflection regardless of the direction. A high asymmetry score indicates a problem where for the same physical movement, the reported coordinates are inconsistent—for example, 60% in one direction and 90% in another. This creates an uneven, often 'egg-shaped,' response zone, which negatively impacts aiming and control predictability.

For the ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K, the Stick Asymmetry is 11.4% for the left stick and 6.5% for the right stick. Higher values can lead to noticeable inconsistencies, potentially impacting aiming or movement in games.

Testing Methodology: It's crucial to note that this test is performed at partial stick deflection (~80%), using special physical limiters (clips). Testing at 100% deflection often hides asymmetries because the controller's output is clamped at the maximum value, artificially 'smoothing' the resulting shape. Our method reveals the true performance of the stick in the ranges most critical for gameplay. This precise approach was also utilized by Linus Tech Tips in their controller review.

For comparison, many budget gamepads show asymmetry levels above 30%, while high-end controllers typically stay below 10% for better uniformity.

Learn more about how different gamepads perform in the Stick Asymmetry test and how to conduct such a test in this article. You can learn how to test joystick asymmetry yourself from this video.

Circle Error

Circle Error evaluates how closely the stick’s movement follows a perfect circle. A high Circle Error means the path is more square-like, which can cause inconsistent speeds when moving diagonally—your character might move faster or slower than expected. The lower the percentage, the better, as it ensures smooth, uniform movement in all directions.

For the ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K, the Circle Error is 2.5% for the left stick and 2.2% for the right stick. This is an excellent result, providing smooth, natural diagonal movement similar to premium controllers.

For comparison, budget gamepads often have Circle Errors above 12%, resulting in 'square' feeling sticks, while high-quality ones aim for under 8% for better smoothness.

Want to learn more? Check out our video explanation of how Circle Error impacts performance.

Resolution (Stick Bitness)

Stick Bitness measures the precision of the joystick’s analog input, similar to bit depth in audio. Higher bitness means more distinct positions the stick can register, leading to smoother and more accurate control. Lower bitness can result in 'stepping' or less fluid movement, especially noticeable in slow, precise actions like aiming.

Unlike declared digital resolution, our True Bitness metric is derived from actual physical stick movement, reflecting the usable positions the stick can produce in practice.

For the ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K, the movement-based True Bitness is 9.8 bits (left) and 9.7 bits (right). This is good precision, providing adequate resolution for smooth control in most gaming scenarios.

This corresponds to a measured Step Resolution of 0.00220 on the left stick and 0.00241 on the right, with about 455 SFC on the left stick and 415 SFC on the right.

For comparison, many budget gamepads have around 8 bits, while premium ones often exceed 10 bits for superior accuracy.

Want to learn more? Check out our video explanation of how Stick Bitness affects control. It is important to note that the video specifies the resolution of the stick, not the bit depth; the higher the bit depth, the higher the resolution.

Center Error (Stick Centering)

Center Error (also referred to as Stick Centering) measures how accurately the joystick returns to its neutral (center) position after you release it. A low Center Error prevents stick drift—a common issue where your character or camera moves slightly in a game, even when you're not touching the stick. The lower the percentage, the better the centering, and the less likely you are to experience drift.

For the ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K, the Center Error is 3.1% for the left joystick and 3.9% for the right stick. This is a poor result. High center error indicates that the sticks do not reliably return to neutral, which will likely cause stick drift unless a significant inner deadzone is applied.

This test methodology intentionally employs a more rigorous approach by implementing small-angle deflection and release, which produces the most challenging conditions for stick re-centering. This technique differs from the conventional maximum-deflection method where the stick is pulled to its full range and released, as small-angle deflection better simulates the micro-adjustments typically executed during actual gameplay scenarios, providing more representative data on potential stick drift occurrence during normal use.

Want to learn more? Check out our video explanation of how Center Error works.

Cardinal Snapping

Cardinal Snapping (sometimes referred to as Axis Magnet) is a form of stick processing where the controller's output artificially 'snaps' or clings to the cardinal (horizontal and vertical) axes when the stick passes close to them. While this can make pure horizontal or vertical movements feel perfectly straight, it distorts the natural movement path and makes diagonal aiming or fine steering less predictable.

The ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K shows no Cardinal Snapping. This means the stick does not artificially cling to the horizontal or vertical axes, preserving your real movement path for consistent aiming and natural analog control.

Want to learn more? Check out our video explanation of how Cardinal Snapping affects stick behavior.

Disclaimer

We tested the ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K gamepad using a single unit, so keep in mind that other units of this model might perform slightly better or worse. In most cases, these differences are minor and shouldn’t affect your experience significantly. The results were obtained with the Stick Tracer program, and some values might vary if you use different software or testing methods.

Testing conditions, such as the gamepad’s firmware version (FW: 1.12) or connection type, can also influence the results. If you have this gamepad, we’d love for you to share your own test results! This will help us build a more comprehensive picture of the ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K’s performance across different units.

Full test results can be viewed on the test page.

Stick Movement Linearity Test

Linearity test for ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K • Firmware 1.12 • Stick Analyzer 2.3.0.4Cable connection • Xinput mode • Hardware Input. Uploaded, by John Punch

Input Type: Hardware Input. The stick was moved with a linear motion device during the test.

Stick Motion Resolution Analysis

This test evaluates the analog stick's ability to register unique positions during a controlled, linear motion from the center to the edge of its range. The analysis was conducted using the Line program, ensuring precise measurement of the stick's resolution, linearity, and response characteristics.

Data Points

Data Points represents the total number of unique positions registered during the smooth movement of the stick from center to edge. This includes both the stable analog values and positions affected by signal processing or jitter. In this test, we recorded 856 data points, which is an excellent result that indicates very precise stick movement registration. For a more accurate assessment of stick precision, it's important to also consider the Straight Points metric, which filters out noise and signal processing artifacts.

Straight Points

Straight Points represent the number of unique positions detected after filtering out tremor and signal processing artifacts during stick movement. This filtering process identifies points that follow a consistently increasing trajectory, showing the true analog values without noise. The test registered 382 straight points. This is an excellent result, indicating very smooth and precise stick movement. This value highlights the stick's ability to provide stable and reliable position data during smooth motion.

Resolution

Resolution in this test refers to two complementary measurements:

Total Resolution: 411 positions across the entire stick range. This number represents how many distinct positions the analog stick can detect from center to edge. This might result in somewhat stepped or less smooth movement

Step Resolution: 0.00243 per increment. This value represents the average size of each step between detected positions (smaller values indicate higher precision). It determines how smoothly the stick can transition between positions, which directly impacts precise aiming and subtle movements in games.

A high total resolution combined with a low step resolution provides the optimal experience for precise control in games requiring fine adjustments.

Tremor

Tremor percentage represents the amount of signal processing that occurs between raw stick movement and the final output. It is calculated as the percentage of data points that don't follow a consistently increasing trajectory. The test measured 55.4% tremor. This higher percentage indicates more active signal processing, which is a characteristic of how this stick handles movement data. Different controllers have different signal processing characteristics, and lower tremor values typically indicate more direct translation of physical movement.

Linearity

Linearity represents how closely the stick movement follows an ideal linear path. It's calculated as 100% minus the nonlinearity percentage, where nonlinearity measures deviations from a perfectly straight line. The test measured 97.9% linearity. This indicates excellent stick linearity, providing consistent and predictable movement.

At the same time, a gamepad stick is not a perfectly linear mechanical system. The stick rotates around a pivot, the cap travels along an arc, and the sensor reads that rotational movement rather than a truly straight physical path. Because of this, a graph that bends slightly below the ideal straight line is often normal. In many cases, that lower arc-like bow reflects the real mechanics of the stick more faithfully than a response that was tuned mainly to look perfectly straight in this specific test.

What matters most is that the movement remains smooth, progressive, and predictable. A mild, even downward curve can be acceptable or even technically more natural, while sharp dips, waviness, uneven acceleration, or asymmetry still indicate worse response quality.

Test Duration

The time taken to complete the test was 2.82 seconds. Note that this test was completed too quickly for optimal results. A slower, more controlled movement would provide more accurate measurements. For the most accurate results, the linear motion device should move the stick smoothly and in a controlled way, typically taking between 5 and 8 seconds.

Reviews of ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K

Add your own review
User experience surveys
How many hours does the gamepad last on a single charge (in the standard scenario)?
The duration of the gamepad's operation from a single charge in hours (regular use).
Enter a value or pick a quick answer
To join the survey, !

ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K specifications

Internal

D-pad buttons type
Mechanical
Main buttons type
Mechanical
Sticks type
TMR

External

Audio port
No
Button layout
Xbox
Display
No
Joystick positioning
Asymmetric
Paddles
2
Rubber handles
No
Shoulder buttons
Yes
Stick tension
No
Trigger lock
Yes

Features

Gyroscope function
Yes
NFC support
No
Switch Wake Up
Yes
Trigger vibration
Yes
Triggers pressing
Analog

Connection

Charging dock
Yes
USB interface
Type-C

Software

Firmware support
Yes
Macros option
Yes
Mobile software
Yes
No Dead Zone
Yes
PC software
No

Platforms

iOS
Cable, Bluetooth
Linux
Cable, Receiver, Bluetooth
Nintendo Switch
Bluetooth
Playstation 5
No
Windows
Cable, Receiver, Bluetooth
Xbox One
No
Xbox Series
No
Results based on answers from 4 users. Specifications are verified by moderators and reflect actual device behavior. Found a mistake? Hover over the specification to report it. Want to contribute? Join our questions survey!
User avatarUser avatarUser avatarUser avatar

LatScore Comparison of ZD Gaming Super Legend Excellence 8K

Users' opinion

Add your opinion
To add an opinion, you need to be !
No opinions have been added yet. Will you be the first?

User comments

You must to submit comment.

19 days ago

It has pc software @John Punch

1
17 days ago

Can you provide link

1
12 days ago

@John Punch yes, I can, so does zd ultimate legend

1
edited 12 days ago

@John Punch https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xOeqrHX2vKYSce7vYoIn3gvV_0mepHmq/view this includes the newest pc software with newest zd ultimate legend software and this tps://drive.google.com/file/d/1eSqURcKY0H_oUEh1SZX_vJu8XyQHQQ3j/view?usp=sharing is the super legend software that works with it otherwise this https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Q48QSWSQW3QFyNMct7DLLqIhzDd5Cn1W is the one that works with the first version of the zd ultimate legend 8k polling software and super legend 8k at 1.1.2 this is all from the website/discord https://zd-gaming.com/pages/downloads

1
edited 26 days ago

Is the ZD Ultimate better?

1
26 days ago

I do not own the ZD Ultimate but I do know with their latest firmware update it gets 8k polling rate now

1
25 days ago

I’ll be testing it soon too, and then we’ll be able to compare the results.

2
25 days ago

@John Punch make sure to also test step size 1 on the zd since the default is 74, should influence the bit resolution results

2
edited 25 days ago

The Ultimate Legend has an issue where the levers that lock down on the insertable stick modules apply pressure on only the right side of each module which causes the modules to be ever so slightly tilted to the right. That causes the distance from stick center to the right boundry to be shorter then to the left side and that causes the calibration to create a left right asymmetry of up to 10%. The Super Legend doesnt have insertable modules so maybe it has better symmetry.

2
24 days ago

@Fabian Möbius That’s a very interesting observation

1

Sigh at the stick centering. Will these companies ever get it right?

1